Using forest waste for energy is not a new concept.

It was 2004 when the first biomass plant, located in Eagar, opened in Arizona — two years after the massive Rodeo-Chediski fire engulfed almost half a million acres of forest, destroying over 400 homes and causing over $43 million in damages.

At the dedication for the Western Renewable Energy plant in Eagar, Corporation Commission Chairman Marc Spitzer called the plant a “win-win-win-win.”

“It’s a win for the forest, it’s a win for clean air, it’s a win for cheaper energy and it’s a win for the rural economy.”

The plant was the first in Arizona to find a commercially-viable use for scraps and small diameter wood, or biomass.

Biomass plants have become more popular since the WRE plant opened 12 years ago.

Former Arizona Sen. Bob Worsley, of Mesa, purchased the old Catalyst Paper Mill plant in Snowflake in 2013, and used biomass to produce energy. Novo Power, LLC, has faced challenges like others in forest industry in the area.

And Show Low’s pellet plant, owned by Forest Energy, became a certified biomass plant two years ago.

Concord Blue, an international energy company based in Germany, plans on opening a biomass plant in Eagar in 2017, using forest waste and possibly pinon and juniper for energy generation.

Last week, as reporter Trudy Balcom reported in today’s Independent, Salt River Project became the first coal-fired power plant to use forest waste for fuel. The company’s test of mixing biomass and coal was successful, and it plans on continuing the experiment.

This could have important implications on the coal industry and jobs in the area.

Here’s why this is important.

Not only do the aforementioned plants create much-needed jobs and sustainable energy with biomass, as Spitzer said 12 years ago, they encourage healthy forests.

The danger of ever-increasing fuel loads in Arizona’s forests, and threats of wildfires, underscores the importance of having viable options in forest industries.

Having a strong wood products industry is just one piece of the multi-faceted equation of protecting our forests’ health and decreasing fire danger.

But it’s an important piece.

(1) comment

ScienceG

Burning wood is not a win-win for anyone. We’re reading another progressive piece of disinformation, not good science and evidence. This isn't about managing the forests or natural resources, nor about politicians using good science and making sound policy decisions for clean, efficient and affordable energy. We all know that this is just another government program paid by tax payers that essentially gives away our natural resources to a few politically-connected special interests. But hurts citizens who are left with higher energy costs, inefficient and polluting power, and more devastated forests.

Calling it “biomass” makes it sound new and “green,” but it is a third-world technology that has failed everywhere it’s been tried. It is not cost effective even with free forest “biomass” product and government subsidies. It has proven to be wasteful, to pollute the environment and risk the health of nearby residents, and to be extremely inefficient for electricity production. Natural gas and coal electric plants, on the other hand, are proven technologies and have become so advanced it is far cleaner and more efficient than burning wood.

Biomass offers none of the benefits being claimed and that is a fact well known in the scientific community. The Biomass Accountability Project, for example, examined the evidence surrounding biomass energy programs: http://www.nobiomassburning.org/OLD/BAP/Home_files/Biomass%20Electricity%20Report.pdf. As it found, biomass energy is neither green nor clean, while wasting tens of billions of dollars of tax payer money.

Claims by the Real AZ group that biomass will bring economic growth to our area is not reality, either. As the Biomass Accountability report found: "The industry defends the subsidies on the grounds of job creation. In reality, the projects are poor job creation vehicles since the investment required to create each job typically exceeds $3,000,000 per permanent full time job."

In fact, this movement to close down our power plants is resulting in the loss of countless jobs throughout our area. Instead of looking for sound economic development and utilizing our rich natural resources, our politicians keep looking for more government money. We really need free market enterprises, honest leaders, and less government collaboration with special interests.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.