By now, most Pinetop-Lakeside voters have received their publicity pamphlet for the upcoming special election, with ballots arriving this week.

This referendum involves rezoning of one parcel within the 344-acre Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange tract at the “gateway” to our town. We urge voters to read the arguments, as this issue involves not just the rezoned parcel but also the larger 344-acre tract. The first two sentences of Mayor Irwin’s argument encapsulates much of the frustration many citizens have with the rezoning.

The Mayor states “In 2018 after 20 years of negotiations, public comment, and serious consideration the 344 acres commonly known as Camp Tatiyee parcel was exchanged from forest service to private ownership. With private ownership comes the right to change the use of the land.”

Yet, the Forest Service in its official Record of Decision for the exchange acknowledged the considerable public concern over how the parcel would be developed, stipulating “any rezoning would follow appropriate processes and ordinances of the Town of Pinetop-Lakeside and include opportunity for public involvement, and any development is expected to be gradual and similar to the low-density of the surrounding area” (emphasis added).

The first thing the town did was approve rezoning of 40 acres as commercial with minimal public knowledge much less involvement, and meager analysis required by town code. Soon after, it began the process to rezone 25.5 acres as RV Park over vigorous neighbor and citizen concerns, again with meager analysis required in Town Code. And after this rezoning was initially approved leading citizens to mount their first referendum, the Town rushed to approve rezoning of another 10 acres as commercial without any analysis whatsoever, violating town code and prompting even its Planning and Zoning Commission to balk. So, with the Forest Service giving citizens expectations and hope that the town would pursue thoughtful and measured development, the reality has been anything but.

We agree that “with private ownership comes the right to change the use of the land” and respect the right to develop consistent with the current zoning (low density residential). But owners do not have a right (but a privilege) to rezoning which confers tremendous value. They must first follow the Town Code analysis requirements and the 2015 voter-approved General Plan requiring a major plan amendment for “any proposal that substantially alters the mixture or balance of land uses, which is fifty gross acres or greater….” With the 344-acre tract (largest non-federal one in town) being carved into smaller pieces with no conceptual planning or major plan amendment to analyze rezoning considerations (or require owners to assist with infrastructure) the town is further failing to fulfill Forest Service and citizen expectations.

Make a difference and vote!

Norris Dodd,

Pinetop

(4) comments

Justsayin141

Thank you so much for your article. This is a little isolated town in a state with terrible education.. It's not always their fault. We need to help them by watching out for them because we know how to research. We can teach them by watching and helping them and maybe we can all work together one day.

Brett cote

We have heard these arguments before. They are demonstrably false. The town of PTLS nor has its town attorney ever argued that a zoning of less than 50 acres requires a major plan addmentment. Point and case; Camp Grace 20 acres, Camp Tatiye 43 acres, both parcels out of the referenced 344 recently were rezoned to comercial ( CR&C) without an addmentment. This is a zoning of 6.2 acres. All the parcels in PTLS were once part of larger parcels, the town does not require a major plan addmentment based on what they were years back. Think how ridiculous that would be.

This is just private land. There are not some special rules because you like it. If you want to control its future, be a stand up Arizonian and buy it. Or stop spreading falsehoods.

libertyminded

We can tell you are not from around here, you "Arizonian." So just move back east instead of trying to make money by super-zoning U.S. Forest lands to high density RV Mobile Home parks. "Carpetbagger" is what we call you.

Brett cote

Liberty minded, respond with a personal insult? I take that as a compliment. That all my points are right. By the way my family has been in AZ since 52, I was born and raised in Tucson, am a AZ resident now and have been for most my life. Sure, I did spend some years in the modwest, Alaska, overseas, Antarctica. I am sure your purity test is real popular. Please try to be more accurate in your posts. It is a seasonal RV park. It is a rezone of 6.2 acres of private property that can't be seen from hwy 260. No public forest out there.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.